And now we have dark flow . . .

Anyone who reads about astrophysics regularly is probably somewhat aware of the terms of “dark matter” and “dark energy” which are used to describe universal conditions that, while creating some observable behavior (ie. predicted mass of galaxies and the speed of the universe’s expansion, respectively), thus far baffle scientists as to “what” is actually causing these effects.  Only recently have advances in astrophysics allowed some degree of observation of dark matter.  Dark energy on the other hand continues to remain very elusive.  Now to add to the two frustratingly unknowable forces we get “dark flow.”  According to this Discovery News article dark flow is a very fast shift of galaxies and stars towards a twenty degree region of space between the constelations Centaurus and Vela.  Like dark matter and dark energy scientists are currently at a loss as to what is causing this dark flow though theories (something about a twin universe just outside the observable region of our own universe) are being thrown around.

Personally I am not against the idea of things like dark matter, dark energy, and dark flow but I find them in many ways comparable to other, now long outdated, explanations in physics.  I speak specifically of the concept of ether (or aether depending on spelling preference). Originally aether was one of the five classical elements (along with air, earth, fire, and water) but during the second half of the 19th Century it took on a different meaning.  It came to be used to explain how wave function could exist in the universe.  Essentially it suggested that there was some underlying medium in the universe through which vibrations could travel. In the long run the aether hypothesis was given up due in part to lack of any evidence of the elusive medium and further knocked down by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.  My point is this, with current observation we are aware that a lot of things are happening in the universe and it is convenient to use terms like Dark Energy or Dark flow to describe the observable effects but the reality is that we know little to nothing about the causes.  As our study of the universe continues we may eventually devise theories or find evidence that does away with the need for any of the “dark” bits that we use right now.  It is the wonderful evolving nature of science.

Just something to consider.  And hey, it is pretty interesting that our whole universe seems to have some motion towards a certain chunk of space right?

1 Response to “And now we have dark flow . . .”


  1. 1 Pixie of key September 27, 2008 at 11:16 am

    I predicted dark flow phenomenon already 28.5.2008

    http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/fo…pic.php?t=2259

    The Google translation

    The baby Galaxies

    http://www.ursa.fi/blogit/ta/index.p…&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

    To links, where it is english

    http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic0811.html

    Maybe these baby galaxies are from different energyconcentration than older galaxies. If so, then the baby galaxies could be moves to detect this.

    Both concentrations of energy, therefore, are located in the visible universe outside and they are expanded, and emit energy waves with a galaxy nature.

    Heitämpä So ilmoille suspicion here!

    Renovation Jukteri

    I made a YouTube video more than a year ago. It will tell why the dark flow is possible!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4ywHC71P7c

    important video


Leave a Reply




About

I like science . . . science is good.

Archives

 

September 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930